The following video by Dr. BJ Lawson again documents how the 4th District of North Carolina is represented by one of the top level politicians who is destroying our country. Mr. Price’s sellout for health care, SEIU, Acorn and now immigration are only some of the examples of how he has no regard for the future of our children or the Constitution. I fully support and endorse Dr. Lawson in the upcoming election for the 4th district. Dr. Lawson has the courage to defend our laws and Constitution in front of 1500 people supporting illegal legislation. Imagine what he will do against approximately 260 Democrat representatives in the House.

David DeGerolamo Read more »

The following is an email sent to NCFreedom concerning the Islamic religion/culture as part of our country’s story. This article is only presented to show that our nation was founded on Judeo-Christian religious concepts. Why our president is rewriting history is left up to the reader.

President Obama, during his Cairo speech, said: “I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America ‘s story.”

Dear Mr. Obama:

Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution?

Declaration of Independence ?

Bill of Rights?

Didn’t think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country’s freedom from England? No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refers to black Muslims as “pug nosed slaves.” Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family’s “rich Islamic heritage,” doesn’t it Mr. Obama?

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present.

There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

Where were Muslims during this country’s Woman’s Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the ‘hajib’ or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for woman’s rights, aren’t they?

Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi’s in killing Jews.

Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren’t flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East. No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day. Strangely, the very “moderate” Muslims who’s asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.

And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the “rich heritage” Muslims have here in America.

Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslim.

And now we can add November 5, 2009 – the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

That, Mr. Obama is the “Muslim heritage” in America.

http://www.thetimesnews.com/news/members-34442-city-travel.html

DURHAM — City Council members will decide June 21 whether they want to end all business travel by members of their government to Arizona until that state repeals its new immigration law.

Members scheduled the vote after City Attorney Patrick Baker advised them they couldn’t go further and declare a boycott on any Arizona-based business that tries to sell to or work with the city.

That “I don’t believe is justified in the statutes of North Carolina,” he said, alluding to laws the General Assembly has established to govern bidding and contracts.

The council is wading into the issue at the request of Durham’s Human Relations Commission.

Like other groups of its type around the country, it believes the new Arizona law, which requires police when they arrest or stop someone to check immigration status if they have reason to believe the person might be in the country illegally.

Critics of the law see that as an invitation to racial profiling, despite anti-profiling language in an amended version of the bill.

The Human Relations Commission’s chairman, Nathaniel Goetz, told council members events in Arizona have “created an environment of fear and hostility amongst minority communities and anyone of color,” nationwide.

“Community groups and Durham’s Police Department have done substantial work in building trusting relationships in our city,” he added. “Arizona’s action flies in the face of these efforts, which are vital for not only helping reduce neighborhood crime, but generat⅛ing⅜ positive relations amongst our city’s growing diversity.”

Other supporters of a boycott noted that the city had similarly acted against apartheid in South Africa. They also pointed out that Arizona has faced boycotts before, following its refusal to adopt the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday.

“Boycotts work,” said Ricardo Correa, noting the state buckled on the holiday issue in the early 1990s after the National Football League relocated a Super Bowl from Tempe, Ariz., to Pasadena, Calif.

Council members by and large didn’t tip their hands Thursday on whether they favor the proposal. The main exception was Councilman Eugene Brown, who was unhappy that it’s coming up while members are still debating the fiscal 2010-11 city budget.

The council has received e-mails on both sides of the issue. Boycott opponents have offered varying reasons for their views. Some agree with Arizona legislators and want a crackdown on illegal immigration.

Others agree with Brown that the issue is tangential for the Durham council.

“If you want to consider a boycott, let’s see if the city does any business involving BP Petroleum products,” said two residents, Jane and Back Dailey, who wrote council members Wednesday to oppose the Human Relations Commission’s request.

The BP reference alluded to the ongoing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

When Barack Obama was elected to be President of the United States, the consensus was that he was the duly elected President and that we have to respect the office. I agreed with part of this at the time: the office of the President should be respected and even though I disagreed with his policies outlined prior to the election, the majority of the country had spoken.

At what point should the office of the President be allowed to divide the country? Listen to his own words: Read more »